I Dream of Jimmy

Marie Brassard’s New York premiere of her one-person work, Jimmy is an absolute "must see." Short yet potent, it’s a small masterwork— a time, gender and genre bender that exemplifies the best of experimental theater. Imagine existing in another’s erotic dream, coming to life when someone conjures you up, changing form according to that dreamer’s whims and then being dropped into a dormant existence at dream’s end—to be resurrected again only when you are next dreamed of, possibly decades later. Imagine silently pleading that someone dream about you just so that you might fully exist once again, even though you might find yourself in a horrible place. That’s the universe of Jimmy.

The set is sparse, elevated—a non-set, really. As the audience filters in, Jimmy is already sitting, almost cowering on the stage, his back to the audience. He has long hair, is half-dressed and looks as if he has been defiled or violated in some manner. As the play begins, Jimmy rises, dresses and addresses the audience. Special effects are sparse but powerful, and consist mainly of background lighting and voice alteration.

“Jimmy” calls himself a “homosexual hairdresser” who came into existence in the erotic dream of a homophobic general in 1950. Jimmy is not a “person,” but an entity. In the dream, he was about to kiss Mitchell, a salon client, but the dream was interrupted when the General suffered a heart attack at the moment of orgasm. Fifty years later, resurrected in the unwanted dream of an actress from Montreal (Brassard), and stuck in an airplane toilet when she awoke, Jimmy spends his “existence” trying to unite with Mitchell, who himself may be a person or a persona. Jimmy does not know. In Jimmy’s world there are dreamers and those who are dreamed. It’s a kind of death to be dreamed and forgotten, much like how the dead must wait for someone to remember them.

In unskilled hands, this quasi sci-fi premise might veer into the merely silly. Ms. Brassard, however, makes this tale almost plausible, imbuing it with heartbreaking poignancy, poetic lyricism and even humor—a combination so very rare these days. A consummate artist, Brassard, with the assistance of P.S 122’s design team, alters her voice with special effects, deepening, slowing it down and slurring it to play the other-worldly Jimmy, and changing it at other times to sound like the effeminate prepubescent boy that the General had previously dreamed up—Jimmy as a child. At 60 minutes, the show lasts just long enough to sustain the content. Brassard wisely keeps it short, masterfully capturing and guiding us through the illogic and malleability of the dream state.

There has been a springtime spate of impressive plays featuring personas that operate in the fertile ground between being and nothingness; two that immediately come to mind are Nerve Tank’s A Gathering and Christina Campanella and Stephanie Fleischmann’s Red Fly/Blue Bottle. We should now add Jimmy to that distinguished company. Stop daydreaming and go see it.

Click for print friendly PDF version of this blog post

Pots and Pans

A bustling, upscale restaurant may be filled with sunlight and laughter, but beneath the patrons' feet is another world they will never know: a dark, grimy, steam-filled cellar where three dishwashers clutch their sponges and wait for their next shipment of dirty, food-stained plates. Morris Panych’s bleak, yet deeply profound comedy, The Dishwashers, focuses on the lives of these three dishwashers: a terminally ill old man named, Moss (John Shuman), a veteran dishwasher and liaison to the world upstairs, Dressler (Tim Donoghue) and a newbie college drop out, Emmett (Jay Stratton).

The men work through the festivities of Christmas, scraping cigarettes out of mashed potatoes, and through the excitement of New Years Eve, hoping that after the ball drops they will find an unfinished flute of champagne in the bus tray.

Charlie Corcoran compliments the mood with a visually capturing set that pulls the viewer into the cellar with the dishwashers. There is no sign of ventilation – not even a ceiling fan – the paint on the wall is peeling and the wooden stairs leading up to the restaurant are moldy and rotted. Emmett’s outfit is too short; the arms barely come past the elbows and the pants end at his knees.

The setup of the room and the condition of their work clothes gives a clear indication of the dishwashers' status, both in life and in the eyes of the restaurant.

Jill Nagle’s lights also add another layer to the story. When the dishwashers are on their lunch break the lights are sharp and piercing, but when they return to work the room dims. Slivers of light seep through the ceiling, casting stripes on the dishwashers' aprons. The result is an image that eerily resembles three inmates toiling away in prison uniforms.

But is their little corner of the world a prison? That is the question bouncing between Emmett and Dressler with a clueless Moss caught in between. Emmett thinks Moss needs to live a little before he dies. Dressler disagrees. Moss was born for this life and he’ll die in this life.

Saddled with emotional problems of his own, Emmett is unsure of his place in the world and wholly susceptible to Dressler’s hard-nosed mentality that anyone who ends up in this cellar will never have the fortitude to work their way out of it.

Dressler is a difficult character to like but a fascinating one to listen to. While Emmett and Moss openly despise their situations, Dressler embraces his. He loves seeing the silverware sparkle in the morning light, even though no one will ever credit him for its shine. “I love this job,” he tells Emmett proudly. “Not because it’s a good job, but because it’s my job.”

Aside from this passionate declaration, Donoghue reveals little about his character’s true nature. He catches himself before the conversation turns personal and throws in a crude joke if he feels the moment getting too chummy. He also shows no remorse for brainwashing Emmett into accepting a life that he is desperate to get out of.

When Dressler first meets Emmett he asks his name. When Emmett tells him Dressler barks, “Wrong! It’s New Guy. You have to earn the right to be called Emmett.” Dressler believes respect is earned by remaining in the cellar, while Emmett feels it lies at the top of the stairs.

The Dishwashers does not lean to one side or the other. There is no heavy-handedness and no clear resolution. Instead, Panych leaves room for the viewer to decide who is at peace with his place in the world and who will always see himself as a prisoner, trapped in a restaurant cellar.

Click for print friendly PDF version of this blog post

Occupational Hazards

It’s inevitable that some of the more revered works in the theatrical canon will be performed more than lesser-known ones. What theater company that can get its hand on Edward Albee or Sam Shepard work can resist the urge to perform it? It is a blessing, then, when a theater troupe decides to breathe life into a more forgotten work. Such is the case with Project: Theater’s’s current production of The Five Lesbian Brothers’ barbed mid-1990s work, The Secretaries at the 78th Street Theatre LAB. The Five Lesbian Brothers remain a rather well-kept secret from the last twenty years of underground independent theater. Comprised of Maureen Angelos, Babs Davy, Dominique Dibbell, Peg Healey and Lisa Kron (she is perhaps the group’s most famous alumni, having scored a Tony nomination for Well), this Obie-winning group emerged in 1989 at the WOW Café.

Hopefully they will remain a secret no more. The Five Lesbian Brothers’ plays subvert such strong ideas as politics and sexism in a darkly comic structure. Both subject and style have been embraced wholeheartedly by director Joe Jung and the rest of Project: Theater’s immensely talented ensemble.

Patty Johnson (Jessi Blue Gormezano) is new to the secretarial pool at Cooney Lumber Mill. While quickly promoted by enigmatic and intimidating boss Susan Curtis (Tara Franklin, creating a perfect ice queen), Patty finds it takes a bit more work to fit in with her three long-standing administrative colleagues, women who seem to know everything about each other’s secrets, and, as Patty quickly learns, hers as well.

One of the great joys of this production of Secretaries is watching this trio both enact and defy automaton stereotypes. Dawn (Karis Danish), Peaches (Laura Dillman) and Ashley (Jenny Schutzman) may address the audience wide-eyed and speak in unison, and they all may subsist on a diet consisting solely of strawberry diet shakes, but each woman has her own freak flag, and the actresses wave them high.

It’s hard not to laugh, for example, at Danish’s mannerisms, some deliberate, some a bit more subtle, but all sustained throughout the show, as Dawn harbors a hysterical same-sex crush on Patty, one that circumvents Susan’s odd requirement of celibacy among her charges. And who can resist laughing as Schutzman, hair apparently drowned in an Aquanet bath so that she resembles something out of a Whitesnake video, makes her character increasingly duplicitous? Meanwhile, it’s worth the wait as Dillman makes Peaches’ deep-seeded insecurities rise to the surface.

Jung moves Secretaries along at a great pace, with scene changes that are done nimbly without calling attention to themselves, and a great attention to detail (including the song choices playing in the background of the secretaries’ local watering hole). Gormezano perfectly embodies the Madonna-whore complex: she has Patty walk a fine line of immersing herself in some of her cohorts’ behavior, including submitting her tampons to Susan for review (yes, the play is edgy, but it works best when its humor is the most pointed), while carrying on an interoffice romance with lumberjack Buzz (a hilarious Brian Frank).

Eventually, Patty catches on to the fact that her colleagues’ hijinks are more than merely wacky, that they might, in fact, involve a more sinister plan. This comes as no surprise to the audience, however, and, if there is any disappointing element with a show as supremely well-executed as Secretaries, the fault can be traced to its source material. The show may be a suspense comedy, but as irreverent as the Five Lesbian Brothers’ work is, it is lacking in the suspense department. There is no great thrill or twist as the show approaches its climax.

Yes, this is a satire about what the women warriors in a male-dominated working world can be driven to, but it never quite reveals what drives them in the first place. One catches on to what the secretaries have up their starched sleeves early on, but there is no reveal as to what motivates them. Nonetheless, this particular production is great fun, and its excellent cast deserves a lot of credit for keeping the ride a fun one.

And I’d be lying if I said this isn’t a show that somehow gets under your skin: I bought a strawberry shake on my way home.

Click for print friendly PDF version of this blog post

Pale Imitations

I’m not quite sure why some newer playwrights presumptuously put their plays on bills along with even the lesser ones of acknowledged masters, but it’s a bad idea. Even if these playwrights don’t overtly suggest that their plays can stand alongside classics, it nonetheless appears that this is precisely what they’re doing. Almost always, it’s an unequal match. This is so even if the play is “classically inspired,” which is how Eric Parness, Artistic Director of Resonance Ensemble, describes three new plays sandwiched around and between short plays by Beckett and Chekhov. The Ensemble’s Reflections is an evening of five “short plays” that could try the patience of the kindliest of theatergoers. Two of the newer playwrights could learn a thing or two about economy and succinctness from the masters. In Ian Strasfogel’s light and ultimately ingratiating "Compromise," a pretentious producer, annoyingly played by the vampy Christine Verleny, tries to convince a conventional Beckettian director (Bill Fairbairn) to set a production of Happy Days in Rwanda because, she opines, Samuel Beckett never really “got it.” Throughout their exchange, a statue of Beckett makes faces at them: approving ones for the Director and nasty ones for the Producer. In the end the Director agrees, against his better judgment, to mount a production set in Afghanistan, and the statue has something to say about that.

Next up is "Catastrophe," a slight and historically over-analyzed, yet effective later play by Beckett himself, written for Vaclav Havel, and around which "Compromise" has been modeled. In "Catastrophe" a fur-wearing, domineering Director (David Arthur Bachrach) overrules every idea his Assistant (Nicole Godino) has regarding the arrangement of the Protagonist (Grant James Varjas), a mute man on a platform, completely at their mercy. The Director is not satisfied until the shivering man has been nearly stripped. The play is an allegory of totalitarian government, stripping its cowed citizenry of their identities. Yet, the play contains a small and successful surprise: the man looks up at the audience, if only for a moment.

Alvin Eng’s overlong "Their Town" is mostly pointless. Based nominally on Thorton Wilder’s Our Town, it’s the story of Harry Cloud (Todd Butera) and Terry Cave (Bill Fairbairn), two irritating ex-American Communist party members who meet again in the afterlife, replete with heavenly garb. In life they stabbed each others' backs and sold each other out; now they’re trying to find atonement, or “at-one-ment,” as Terry not so cleverly quips ad nauseum. I soon lost interest in this boring and hollow story of Harry and Terry’s karmic debt, and so did the man snoring quietly next to me. Mercifully, a 10-minute intermission followed.

Anton Chekhov’s "Swan Song" comes next. The play is a sketch of a drunk, elderly actor (Bill Fairbairn) who bemoans having dedicated his life to the theater and fears the approach of death with no family to support him. It’s a minor work that still packs a punch as the old man slowly regains his bearings and realizes he had no other mission in life quite as fitting as his chosen profession.

Wrapping up the evening is Michael Feingold’s smart but ultimately ridiculous "What Happened Then," a play which takes place in the early 1700s and tells, or at least attempts to tell, the story of two Englishmen whose tragic lives come together and apart, through unbelievable twists of fate, over the course of two decades. Mr. Feingold has a gift for the era’s vernacular, and his characters are convincing even if their stories are not. As Mr. Feingold piled on the unlikeliest of scenarios with a straight face, some in the audience snickered and I was reminded of the far-fetched tales of Commander McBragg from The Rocky and Bullwinkle Show. Should Mr. Feingold cultivate the obvious comic potential of this story, it might be a better play.

As you might expect, the offerings that come out on top in Reflections are the likely suspects. Short and to the point, the plays by Beckett and Chekhov are perfect examples of economy and conciseness. Those of Mr. Eng and Mr. Feingold are not. Mr. Parness’ direction of these plays is confident and professional, but it can’t help the material. Colleen Kesterson’s costume design is one of the more convincing aspects of this production. Sarah B. Brown’s movable stage design is serviceable and frequently clever. All in all, though, I cannot recommend that readers see this production.

Click for print friendly PDF version of this blog post

2009 Obies - Congratulations

The 54th Annual Village Voice OBIE Awards were presented on Monday, May 18, 2009 at a ceremony held at the newly landmarked Webster Hall in Manhattan.

Co-hosted by former OBIE winners Martha Plimpton and Daniel Breaker, the awards were presented by Anne Hathaway, Brian d'Arcy James, Gavin Creel, John Shea, Karen Olivo, Kate Mulgrew, Marc Kudisch and Nilaja Sun.

Highlights included Anne Hathaway's presentation of the Lifetime Acheivement Award to Earle Hyman, and his touching, humorous acceptance speech, in which he detailed his early obsession with dramatic literature and the playwrights and actors who influenced his choice of profession. Ruined, Lynn Nottage's intense examination of rape in the Congo, was named Best New American Play. Several of the production's actors, Quincy Tyler Bernstine, Saidah Arrika Ekulona, and Russell Gebert Jones, also received performance awards. Stephen Sondheim, whose works have been more commonly seen on Broadway, was awarded a Music and Lyrics Obie for his Off-Broadway musical Road Show and accepted it in person.

The Obie Grants, cash prizes awarded to organizations, went to new Long Island City venue The Chocolate Factory, The Classical Theatre of Harlem and the Lark Play Development Center. HERE Arts Center received the Ross Wetzsteon Award.

A new feature of the ceremony this year was Creative Block, a separate event occuring simultaneously in a separate part of the venue and eventually merging with the Obie after-party, also held at Webster Hall. Tickets to this multidisciplinary arts event were available to the general public for purchase.

Congratulations to all those whose theatrical achievements and contributions were honored this year. We look forward to seeing more of your work.

For more information about the Obie Awards, visit the official website www.obies.villagevoice.com.

The Winners:

Lifetime Achievement Award
Earle Hyman


Best New American Play (includes a cash prize of $1000)
Ruined by Lynn Nottage (Manhattan Theater Club)

Performance
Francois Battiste
, The Good Negro (Public Theater)
Quincy Tyler Bernstine, Ruined (Manhattan Theater Club)
Kevin T. Carroll, sustained excellence of performance
Saidah Arrika Ekulona, Ruined (Manhattan Theater Club)
Jonathan Groff, Prayer for My Enemy (Playwrights Horizons) and
The Singing Forest (Public Theater)
Birgit Huppuch, Telephone (Foundry Theatre)
Russell Gebert Jones, Ruined (Manhattan Theater Club)
Aaron Monaghan, The Cripple of Inishmaan (Atlantic Theater Co.)
Sahr Ngaujah, Fela! (37 Arts)
Lorenzo Pisoni, Humor Abuse (Manhattan Theater Club)
James Sugg, Chekhov Lizardbrain (Pig Iron Theatre Company)
John Douglas Thompson, Othello (Theatre for a New Audience)

Music and Lyrics
Stephen Sondheim, Road Show (Public Theater)

Directing
David Cromer, Our Town (Barrow Street Theatre)
Katie Mitchell, The Waves (National Theatre of Great Britain / Lincoln Center Great Performances <"New Visions Series")
Ken Rus Schmoll, Telephone (Foundry Theatre)

Design
Toni-Leslie James, sustained excellence of costume design (w/special reference to Wig Out, Vineyard Theatre)
David Korins, sustained excellence of set design (w/special reference to Why Torture Is Wrong... Public Theater)

Special Citations
Sarah Benson (director) and Louisa Thompson (set designer), Blasted (Soho Rep)
David Esbjornson (director) and Christian Camargo (actor), Hamlet (Theatre for a New Audience)

The Ross Wetzsteon Award (includes a cash prize of $2000)
HERE Arts Center

OBIE Grants ($10,000 divided equally among three theaters)
The Classical Theatre of Harlem
The Chocolate Factory
Lark Play Development Center

Click for print friendly PDF version of this blog post

Marriages on the Rocks

For its inaugural production, InProximity Theatre Company has chosen audaciously. Craig Wright’s 2002 play Orange Flower Water is a no-holds-barred look at two disintegrating marriages. Scenes include the typical recriminations, bitterness, indecision, and uncertainty that such splits spawn—as well as a marital rape (though not one you might expect). It’s emotionally intense, unleavened by humor, yet finally hopeful, and it requires four committed actors. David Calhoun, a pharmacist, and Cathy Youngquist, a choir director, are married, but David is having an affair with Beth, the wife of a video store owner, Brad. Beth is a devout Lutheran: after three years of talking and mooning over each other and declaring their affection, they are about to move to intercourse, at a cabin the Youngquists own. “Cathy … is a mistake that I made,” says David to reassure Beth, “and I am a mistake that she made.” But Beth (Laurie Schaefer) balks at the last minute: “So am I a mistake you’re making? Are you a mistake I’m making?”

Still, Beth has a dream of happiness that includes a daughter named Lily and an incident with orange flower water that Lily spills onto the seat of their car, suffusing the car with its odor. In the end, her dreams win out, and she and David (Brent Vimtrup) move their affair forward.

Brad (Michael Poignand), meanwhile, knows something is up, and he seems to bait David at their sons’ soccer game, asking with relentless machismo about David’s sexual inclinations toward various women around the field. Later, at home, Brad confronts Beth, who is about to leave, and all hell breaks loose. Poignand reaches deep for the raw hurt and resentment, yet he also finds genuine sympathy in Brad, who is very much an insensitive jerk, but also more. When he rushes to the window to see if Beth has driven off yet, hoping that she hasn’t, his shoulders drop defeatedly—it’s a telling physical moment. And his teary recitation of a letter imploring her for another chance is deeply moving.

The other actors do creditable jobs as well, though perhaps Jolie Curtsinger’s Cathy is a bit too chirpy in her first scene, a monologue; however, she’s nicely restrained and confident during an awkward conversation that Cathy has with Beth. Vimtrup and Schaefer make an interesting, exceedingly ordinary couple, fumbling their way toward true intimacy.

One of Wright’s strengths, in fact, is his feeling for ordinary people in small-town America (his latest play, Lady, is about three hunters), and one feels both the suffocation of small-town life—the play is set in Pine City, Minn.—and the yearnings of the characters for something more. “People are always hurting each other and love keeps happening,” David writes in a letter to Lily in the final scene. “It just keeps happening. And the longer you live and the more you notice this, the harder it gets to know what’s right and wrong.”

Director Bryn Boice keeps the tension up throughout most scenes, helped by Amy Altadonna’s mood-sustaining score and sound design. However, a scene when Cathy demands sex from David is staged too coyly. Nudity may not be necessary, but the actors register as self-conscious, fumbling with the sheets for cover when no flesh is ever exposed. (Conversely, it would have been nice if costumer Tescia Seufferlein had provided Schaefer with a costume that covered the numerous distracting tattoos on the actress’s hips.)

Designer James J. Fenton has elaborated smartly on the chairs, bed, and bedside tables that the script calls for. The back wall, painted white, includes rectangles placed as if they were paintings (though they’re empty) and an architectural fantail above the bed. All the paint, however, has been badly weathered, so the wall ingeniously suggests both interior and exterior; it also serves as a visual parallel to the exposed emotions of the characters. Fenton has also scattered pine needles on the floor of the small space, and the audience steps on them to get to their seats.

Orange Flower Water has some unfortunate implausibilities, most notably a scene near the end in which David and Beth scream at each other in a house they’re looking to buy. No real estate agent would leave them alone for the length of time the scene plays, and certainly not when they’re yelling so loudly. But it is a play full of emotional honesty and painful realities, and InProximity’s fine production does it justice. It’s an impressive calling card for the new company.

Click for print friendly PDF version of this blog post

All that Glitters. . .

The truth is a tricky thing. A person can know another person for years, have a deep relationship with them, and still never know what is really going on. What seems to be so often is in fact not. Labeling itself as a "zen exploration of the gap between truth and convenient fiction," Ore, or Or, a new play by Duncan Pflaster (who wrote last summer's delightful Prince Trevor Amongst the Elephants), places in parallel the facts of the story of General Tomoyuki Yamashita and the convoluted love lives of four New Yorkers. Yamashita, a general of the Japanese army during World War II, allegedly buried a fortune in gold in caverns underground somewhere in the Phillipines. In Ore, or Or, Calvin Kanayama, an art historian at the Metropolitain Museum of Art, is attempting to determine whether or not several gold statues found in the Phillipines are in fact some of Yamashita's gold. He's also having dreams about Yamashita, which adds an imaginative element to the play that, unfortunately, does not go very deep. At its heart, Ore, or Or is a story about four self-absorbed and lost people. Calvin meets Debby in a bar on St. Patty's day and they hit it off enough that he goes home with her, and ends up spending the next 10 months dating her. Maybe. What is "dating," anyway? Given that they're relatively hip, young, and live in New York, the characters make a lot of philosophical-ish quips and ruminate on the way society functions. Debby and her roommate Sean live in Spanish Harlem and lament the way it is being gentrified, all while admitting that they are part of the gentrification. The banter and quips could get heavy-handed but manage not to and the actors deliver them with spot-on timing.

The play is set up as a series of vignettes, each occurring on a holiday during each month of the year (starting the day after St. Patrick's day and ending on Valentine's Day). The structure of play prevents it from feeling overextended. There are scene shifts within the scene shifts, giving the two hour plus play a feeling of brevity. A woman dressed as a geisha controls the scene shifts with a disinterested wave of her hands. Rachel Lin, the actress playing the geisha as well as several other roles (a photographer, Calvin's sister, a Halloween party hostess) is a strong performer, shifting from role to role effortlessly. The other actors handle their roles nicely and there is a sense that each actor has settled comfortably into his or her character's skin.

That's important, as it makes the audience feel empathy for the struggles and pains of each one. Without that (and without the Yamashita metaphor), Ore, or Or would feel all to much like any other play written about young people and the troubles of love. With his large imagination and witty dialogue, Pflaster is definitely a playwright to watch. Although the Yamashita element could be deepened and expanded, Ore, or Or offers a nice alternative to the basic romantic comedy.

Click for print friendly PDF version of this blog post

Faster, Pussycat!

In Sean Gill’s Go-Go Killers!, we find ourselves in a New York City of the future, a post-apocalyptic landscape (both financial and environmental) into which stomp a legion of rogue go-go chicks, who have created an underworld of their own, in response to the wealthy white male-dominated society which rules them. At once retro and futuristic (like comic books of the 1950s), Rachel Klein’s proficient direction and skilled choreography channel the cult films of Russ Meyer, (largely Faster, Pussycat, Kill! Kill!) complete with cinematic transitions, mod costumes and make-up, and a 1960s-era surf music soundtrack. This is the latest Gill/Klein collaboration, and again, their styles and sensibilities seem to blend together perfectly. We follow one girl gang called the Furies, led by Electra, and played, well electrifyingly, by Elizabeth Stewart, as they seek revenge against their former captors and venture into the “Old Jersey desert.” By her side are a feisty Pam Grier-esque Pandora, played by Reagan Wilson; the romantic Godiva, played by Jillaine Gill; and newbie Marietta, whom we watch earn her new name – Bloody Mary, played by Kari Warchock. With a cock of the hip, a toss of the hair, stomp of a boot, or even taking hits as well as they dish them out, these women are fierce; and moreover, they know it. Much amusement ensues as they attempt to upset the balance, taking two of their blue-blood tormentors, Kevin G. Shinnick’s smarmy Nelson, and the sheltered Eugene (and Marietta’s former fiancé), played by Joe Stipek, captive and into the wilds of old New Jersey.

In this new/old world, the girl gangs are aggressive and competitive, amongst themselves and others, leading to many entertaining dance-off beat-downs along the way. Their main rivals are the sassy Gorgons, appropriately dressed in sparkling sea-green and blue tones, who give them a good run for their money. Featuring Dana Perry as Gypsy, Robyn Nielsen as Ginger, Megan O’Connor as Jezebel, and Marna Kohn as Georgette, the tough Gorgons keep popping up at the most inopportune moments, adding to the conflict at hand. There are also golden go-go’s (led by Dance Captain Michelle Cavallero), silver go-go’s, and even boy go-go’s, played by Preston Burger, Freddy Mancilla, and Brian Rubiano, all dancing with aplomb. These multi-chorus assemblages are also evocative of the cult film genre and are fun to watch as they layer and/or unfold from every direction. Don DiPaolo gives a great, goofy performance as another supporting character, truly earning his “wife-beater,” as The Wop. And for effect there’s also the ubiquitous butler, Godfrey, embodied by the lithe Michael Porsche.

The dialogue is snappy and amusing. Gill’s script sounds equally stylized, even with hints of more emotional depth for the characters than one might suspect. However, by the third act, with the arrival at the Queen’s Lair, the narrative kind of falls apart, as does the kick-ass road movie vibe by way of too-long speeches involving backstory and a certain amount of tidying up, which feels unnecessary. Even the once-fierce main characters seem dulled down. It’s understood that they’re now in the manipulative hands of the reigning underground monarch, but the loss of Electra’s power and strong lead, for example, saps the energy and leaves us hanging. The Queen is played extravagantly by Leasen Beth Almquist, but the character feels more out of a Kenneth Anger film landscape, showing more style than substance. Or maybe it’s just a switch of leads too late in the game.

The go-gos' 60s-style costumes, designed by Emily Dorwart and coordinated by Jillaine Gill and Rachel Klein, and the hair and make-up are all put together wonderfully, with the gangs coded by color and/or theme. The rousing surf music soundtrack, designed by both Klein and Gill, further reveals their “wonder-twin” powers and complements the vibe and motion. The spacious set-up of the Sage Theater, with some nightclub-style seating up in front, nicely frames the stage’s extended runway, to fully exploit the space for dancing and flourished entrances/exits. The minimalist props, designed by Lizz Giorgos and Joey Nova, like the cocktail glasses/serving trays; cacti/tumbleweeds; and scads of flying money, blend well into the choreography, while also providing maximum impact.

The Sage Theater is an interesting venue for this piece, used for off-Broadway theater, comedy shows, and other events since about 2002. Before that time, according to the Cinema Treasures website, it had a bit of a checkered past (as do many theaters in New York City), serving since the 1970s as a Spanish language movie theater, gay porn house, commercial cinema twin, and then back again to a porn theater, before the legendary Times Square clean-up beginning in the late 1990s. Go-Go Killers! brings back a fun and less-naughty shimmy-shake into the once-grimy Times Square, with a strong sense of nostalgia, a simultaneous nod to past and present, and all just a few kick-steps off-Broadway. So what are you waiting for, Pussycat? Go-go!

Click for print friendly PDF version of this blog post

One Little Bite Changes Everything

It's difficult to be tempted. One so often gives in to whatever the temptation is. Such was the case with Eve, the (kind of) first woman, when the serpent questioned her about eating the fruit from the tree of knowledge. Of course, it's also difficult to be cast aside by a lover for another, as was the case with Lilith, sometimes thought to be the first wife to Adam. And as they say, hell hath no fury as a woman scorned, and so Lilith, in her rage, transformed into a serpent to tempt Eve and thus bring about the fall of man. Of course, that's not quite the version of the fall of man presented in Genesis. Company XIV, a dance-theater company heavily inspired by Baroque dance, drew from several sources to create their Le Serpent Rouge, including Jean Cocteau's Le Bel Indifferent, poems by Charles Bukowski, and the Bible. Their version of the temptation and the fall is as sensuous, spectacular, and rococo as it can get, with a shiny pressed tin backdrop, a whip wielding, thigh-high boot-clad Ring Mistress narrating events, a large chandelier that doubles as the tree of knowledge, and a fog machine. Lilith, that first, soulless partner to Adam, wears only a few delicately placed sequins while Adam and Eve wear leaves and dangle from gilt trapeze bars.

As it is a piece of dance-theater, the story is told primarily through movement, with the Ring Mistress providing most of the narration. Adam and Eve (John Beasant III and Laura Careless) dance their first dance together as silhouettes in a foggy prelapsarian haze. The Ring Mistress snaps her whip and there is a sharp change in the lights, the sound, the entire experience, as Lilith borrows the costume of the serpent in order to tempt Eve.

What follows as part of the temptation is a walk-through of the Seven Deadly Sins, beginning with vanity. A large gilt-framed mirror is wheeled onstage. Eve is dressed in a baroque-style gown and given a wig topped with a sailboat. Olivera Gajic's costumes are ornate and lush even when they are practically non-existent. The vanity section ends with Lilith pulling the strings of Eve's corset so tight that she screams. And so it is with the fall: it introduced new, previously unfound joy, as well as pain and sorrow. As the Ring Mistress says, after the sins have all been accounted for: "to choose knowledge is to choose to live. . . to fall is to know the intricacies of life’s deepest joys and sorrows."

Le Serpent Rouge almost threatens to be too long. There is a brief second act, separated from the first by an entre-act performance of Eartha Kitt's " A Woman Wouldn’t Be a Woman" by a drag queen. The second act serves as a quick summation and almost feels tacked on to the piece, a quick little bow to tie everything up.

Company XIV has done an excellent job in bringing the first story to life. Le Serpent Rouge is an exciting and unique blend of contemporary and classical versions of the fall of man, done in the way only Company XIV can.

Click for print friendly PDF version of this blog post

Fly Me to the Moon

Has the state of the world ever seemed so dismal that leaving planet Earth looked like the only practical answer? In Mare Cognitum, a pleasant, but sometimes too gloomy entry in Theatre of the Small-Eyed Bear’s Get S.O.M. repertory merger, three fed-up roommates decide to boldly go where no twenty-somethings have gone before. Faced with the ever-widening precipice of war and full-fledged adulthood, Lena, Jeff and Thomas are immobilized like Beckett’s Vladimir and Estragon, unable to muster up the will to join the protest just outside their window or even to go on a job interview. Jeff has made himself a protest sign that reads “Homo Sapiens Sapiens,” even though the rally is protesting the US government’s imminent bombing of another country, but he has yet to get out of his pajamas. College student Lena distances herself by critiquing the protest, although an unnamed, hipster classmate’s shrewder assessment makes her feel even more academically and politically ineffectual. Thomas the atheist comes to terms with the fact that he has actually been going to confession all these weeks and not to job interviews. Imaginative denial obviously runs high in this apartment, but it takes the depressing news that the bombing has commenced to launch our protagonists into a Quixotic extra-planetary adventure.

Jeff and Lena in particular (played by Kyle Walters and Devon Caraway) show a refined skill in make-believe, staging a “practice” protest in the apartment before unsuccessfully attempting to join the actual one downstairs. In general, playwright David McGee does well to let his characters play with each other and the audience like this; indeed, they seem quite aware when they are reenacting each other’s flashbacks and happily pretend to be secondary characters with enthusiasm. If the tone weren’t perfect, this sort of high style narrative device wouldn’t work, but McGee’s ebullient attitude and lively characters work hard to persuade you that there is nothing weird about it. More importantly, when these three make like Apollo-era astronauts and fly their apartment to the moon, you don’t question it. McGee and director Jesse Edward Rosbrow draw a line between fantasy and reality that is sharp, believable and entertaining.

What does feel out of place, though, are the intensely devastated reactions the characters experience when they return to the same-old, disheartening Earth at the end. McGee obviously intends some reference to the spiritual disillusionment astronauts are said to suffer upon coming back to Terra Firma, but when his high-spirited characters experience heartbreak so totally – like Jeff, who crumples against a wall sobbing – it feels like too much, too quickly. The notion that Lena, Jeff and Thomas are detached enough to pretend to fly to the moon is one thing, but to see them reduced to husks of people when their knowingly make-believe adventure ends is near laughable. In short, things are pretty bad on Earth these days, but they can’t suddenly feel that much worse than before.

Director Rosbrow stages the action convincingly within the confines of a living room, and the world he creates for the characters is particularly accented by a thorough sound design from Jared M. Silver. There is almost always specific environmental noise coming from outside the apartment – the protest, a garbage truck, and later, otherworldly moon noises. Elisha Schaefer’s set design and Wilburn Bonnell’s lighting design satisfy until an underwhelming “Earthrise” on the Moon spoils an otherwise nice moment – though given the level of production and likely budgetary limitations, it almost feels unfair to mention it.

The cast leaps to task as necessary, with Walters giving the most endearing performance as Cowardly Lion-ish Jeff. Caraway’s bossy, inconstant Lena is convincingly vigilant to the point of nuisance, though she softens in some very affecting moments with Jeff. Justin Howard as Thomas is, by design, left out of a lot of the fun, but one of the play’s funniest moments comes when he reluctantly agrees to join the imaginary journey.

Back in the real real world, Mare Cognitum represents another kind of unique escape – the escape from expense. Theatre of the Small-Eyed Bear is actually an amalgamation of Theatre of the Expendable, Small Pond Entertainment, and Cross-Eyed Bear Productions, three theater companies that have banded together to save on theater rental and production costs. A fitting set-up – three companies coming together to play – for McGee’s playful lunar romp.

Click for print friendly PDF version of this blog post

Best Western

In the last major production of Sam Shepard's True West, Philip Seymour Hoffman and John C. Reilly famously alternated performances as Austin and Lee, the play's antagonistic brothers. Nearly a decade later, smartly creative theater company Curious Frog has brought the play back to New York with an equally playful approach: in place of the last production's Broadway house, Curious Frog has staged the production in an East Village apartment. Like the 2000 Broadway production, Curious Frog's quirky treatment of the contemporary classic is much more than an impressive stunt (and it's that, too). Under the solid direction of Isaac Byrne, the production's unique setting and cast -- the family is Asian-American -- bring fresh insight to the familiar work of American drama. Shepard's story of near primal rivalry between estranged brothers is among his least surreal plays, and Curious Frog's staging emphasizes the play's realism. Folding chairs line the walls of the intimate performance space, leaving literally little room for actorly artifice. That staging reveals how skillfully the text accomplishes the unlikely: Austin (Alvin Chan), an Ivy-educated screenwriter who addresses his drunk, drifter brother Lee (Edward Chin-Lyn) with equal parts exasperation and condescension, all but takes his place by the drama's end. A number of Shepard-influenced plays have attempted similar fraternal switches with greater affectation and less success (this season's Three Changes at Playwright's Horizons, last season's American Sligo at Rattlestick), so it's refreshing to see the conceit work.

Anyone seeking to create site specific theater in New York should see Curious Frog's True West, making note of the comprehensive ways in which the production uses design elements in its found space. David Ogle's scenic design doesn't quite transform the East Village sublet into a house in suburban LA, but it need not. He instead capitalizes on the strengths of the space, creating an environment simultaneously homey and claustrophobic, never taking for granted that audiences will be tickled simply at seeing theater in an apartment building. Together with Chelsea Chorpenning's period props, the scenic design lends the space a comfortable familiarity that helps put audiences at ease with their location inside the home, treating audiences less like intruders and more like a part of the design scheme. It also appropriately incorporates Ross Graham's dramatic light design, which smartly locates opportunities for lending the natural setting a powerful theatricality.

If creating a fully-designed production in the sublet apartment poses exciting challenges to the designers, the actors face equally daunting tasks. Over the course of the play, the brothers' interactions turn increasingly violent. Their fight sequences appear tightly choreographed (fight design by Jacob Grigolia-Rosenbaum ), so that while the action is powerfully startling for up-close audience members to witness, it's also safe. And fun. As Lee, the more initially destructive brother, Chin-Lyn exhibits an angry, destitute optimism which frustrates the restrained Austin. In the second half of the play, when Austin's growing sense of futility turns to enraged desperation, Chan comes into his own and the showdown between the brothers takes off. Part of the pleasure of seeing the production is sitting steps away as a typewriter is destroyed by an iron golf club, as the brothers smash potted plants and one another.

The title of True West alludes to the play's insistence on the artifice of both the vanishing American frontier and the false promises of Hollywood. By making the brothers Asian-American, Curious Frog cleverly adds an additional layer. The play's exploration of authenticity and the illusive American dream applies seamlessly to characters of color, making a strong case for nontraditional, race-conscious casting (which is different from colorblind casting, and frustratingly uncommon.) Beyond that, it's neat to see how a True West with Asian-Americans maintains the integrity of the text while adding a new dynamism to particular lines (Lee's image of his brother's success that includes his being chased by blonds; Austin's story about their pathetic father's doggy bag of Chop Suey).

The best revelation of the casting, however, has nothing to do with the brothers. It comes at the end of the play, when their mother returns to find her grown sons wrecking her home. The mother's appearance in the final scene of True West is among the script's more problematic aspects; her uncomprehending reaction to her trashed house, her sons' violence, and even the outside world is inexplicably peculiar. But as played by Mami Kimura, originally from Japan, Mom is not not simply a daffy woman in deep denial. She's also an immigrant. It makes infinitely more sense, in this production, that her sons treat her protectively even as they believe themselves capable of exploiting and misleading her. Kimura's accented English bolsters the mother's general appearance of incomprehension. To her sons, she's literally a foreigner.

"Look at you," Lee asks his brother early in the play "You think yer regular lookin'?" Whatever the answer to that question, Curious Frog's True West is decidedly not; its found space and nontraditional cast give it a facade all its own. At the same time, it's a scrupulously faithful production of a terrific script: a True West defined by conservatism and adventurousness.

Click for print friendly PDF version of this blog post

Boys Not Allowed

No-one would ever have described the life of a 30-something woman as “easy.” But in the post-Sex and the City era, in which rowdy banter over brunch has become a cliché and nights of martini-shaped cocktails are part of a mating dance to land Mr. Big and his penthouse apartment, women are forced to spend more and more time explaining where their own desires fit into this frantic spectrum of expectations. On one side are relatives demanding a summer wedding and a baby bump; on the other, the now-archaic image of a power-hungry “single gal.” For all these reasons, shows like Mel & El: Show and Tell are arguably more necessary than ever. During a time in which writing a story about female friendship and singlehood is likely to be met with more than a few eye rolls, exploring the emotional shades of gray in what it means to be a woman takes creative guts. This is exactly what Mel and El does, in a rowdy, heartfelt, and endearing production.

Written by two real-life best friends, Melanie Adelman and Ellie Dvorkin, this mini-musical is the latest in the duo’s string of collaborations, which includes a Gotham Comedy Club appearance, a NYMF entry, and a subsequent year-long run of their festival show, Mel and El: This Show Rhymes, at The Duplex. Lounging in a hot pink room plastered with images of ‘80s icons like Guns N’ Roses, Cher and Meat Loaf, the pair reminisce about their long friendship, address their secret desires (strangers’ babies are becoming cuter by the day), argue about their differences (El is an exhibitionist, Mel more tightly wound), and even sing about their darker traumas (plastic surgery, a lifelong obsession to be perfect).

It’s the paradigm of this physical space that allows us to get to know these two characters so quickly; surrounded by mementos of their childhoods, Mel and El don’t have to deal with the burdens of a public façade, and let us know early on that inside this room-within-a stage, they feel safe. “Our little pink box is where we are/It’s better than a disco, better than a bar/We do what we like, we’re totally free/You can be you and I can be me,” they sing, and we both sense their lack of pretention and feel honored to be let into their world. As they recall the routines, innuendo-laden inside jokes and over-the top dreams of their teenage years, we root for them—because many of us, even as adults, act just as foolishly when we think that nobody is watching.

Mel and El’s private territory isn’t wholly free from intrusion; their nagging mothers—one a pill-popping stereotype of a Jewish mother and one a foul-mouthed Brit—make two brief appearances during the show. Instead of being played by two additional actors, however, they are introduced as a pair of puppets (handled by Jeremiah Holmes) that resemble characters in Avenue Q. The choice is hilarious and unexpectedly poignant; like the invisible, metallic-voiced parents in early Peanuts cartoons, these demanding grown-ups are a different species altogether.

The score, composed by Patrick Spencer Bodd, doesn’t always match up to Adelman and Dvorkin’s gleefully written text, but boasts a few standouts. "She’s My Bitch," the show’s opening and closing number, is appropriately catchy, while "I’m Hatin’ on Ya" cleverly channels a mid-‘90s pop rap song. Despite the show’s outrageous feel, a few ballads give momentum to its narrative and keep it from spinning in place. Some quieter moments—especially the usually jovial El’s song about her experiences with plastic surgery—are downright haunting in their sense of lived realism. “I’d managed to avoid the scene/Where every Jewish princess cuts her face apart at age thirteen,” she sings, creating a pained moment that’s difficult to forget.

Like Mel and El, most of us know that hiding in our childhood bedrooms won’t provide permanent protection against the world’s expectations or keep us from panicking about the numerous dreams we were too self-doubting or preoccupied to fulfill. But unlike so many tales about single women, the work encourages us to find comfort in what we already have—and find hilarity in both our secret desires and our shortcomings.

Click for print friendly PDF version of this blog post

I Need Directions to Heaven

Despite a fascinating historic subject, Equilicuá Producciones’ New York premiere of Spanish playwright Juan Mayorga’s Way to Heaven gets lost along the road due to casting, directorial, and occasional writing problems. The script has moments of tremendous beauty and profundity, but the production team should have stopped to ask for directions on this circuitous trip to paradise. For subject matter, Mayorga could not have reached higher or tackled a more satisfyingly dramatic story. The play presents fragments of personal stories around the Theresienstadt concentration camp run by the Nazis during World War II. When the Danish government insists on sending the Red Cross in to evaluate conditions at Theresienstadt, the Nazis revamp the camp into a public relations tool to convince the world that the concentration camps for Jewish and political prisoners are innocuous little villages with balloon sellers in the town square, quaint little synagogues, orchestras playing daily, and joyous inmates.

This historically accurate deception concealed the fact that inmates were constantly being shipped to extermination camps at Auschwitz, over a quarter of the inmates were dying of hunger or disease-- and of the 15,000 Jewish children that were enrolled in Theresienstadt’s fake schools, art programs, and sports leagues, less than 100 would survive the war.

The play is structured into five scenes, the first of which is the weakest, getting the evening off to a rocky start. Shawn Parr plays the Danish Red Cross worker who tours the camp and signs an extremely rosy report on the conditions of the inmates. Unfortunately the script gives him and the audience no clue who he is talking to. He recites an oral history of his experiences that has all the charm and character of a high school text book entry. Inexplicably he is wearing an overcoat and plaid pajamas, which contributes to a bewildering lack of context and place. And while Parr has a nice speaking voice, that doesn’t really compensate for a lack of character and notable line problems.

The second scene contains the largest cast. Their energy, and the most inventive staging of the evening from director Matthew Earnest, liven things up a bit. The ensemble plays camp inmates called upon to perform bogus village-life scenes, scripted by the camp commandant. Ten-year-old Samantha Rahn (The Girl) is the clear, luminous stand out. Rahn has an extraordinary presence and composure for such a young actress. She was transplanted from the American premiere of the play in Raleigh, NC. The only other exquisitely cast actor in the play is another transplant from the same production, Francisco Reyes (The Commandant).

Reyes takes welcome center stage in scene three, delivering a riveting monologue to an unseen Red Cross worker with all the oily charm of a seasoned bureaucratic grifter. The script provides Reyes the opportunity to shine that it denied Parr. There is never a doubt who Reyes is talking to, where he is, or what lies beneath the surface his charming, lying, well-met exterior. Reyes is picture perfect as a Nazi poster boy for maniacal artifice and seductive guile.

Scene four features a duologue between Reyes’ Commandant and Mark Farr as the camp’s Jewish mayor, Gershom Gottfried. Reyes continues to deliver, but his philosophy-obsessed, theater-loving Commandant does not find an adequate foil in Farr. Farr’s Gottfried is clearly the emotional heart of the play. He is given the tortured power to decide which inmates will be “cast” in the production and which will be sent for extermination. But, Earnest could hardly have found a less tortured or tragic-looking actor. Farr is a pleasant, placid-looking, even-keeled man who never sells the idea that he is suffering crippling moral dilemmas. His helpless fury over being forced to send children to gas chambers looks a bit more like a petulant sulk over losing a squash game at the gym. The last scene, the emotional climax delivered as a monologue by Farr, falls flat on this lack of expressiveness. Rahn, however, does a nice job bringing some pathos to the final moments as a doomed child about to be swallowed by the Nazi death machine.

The Way to Heaven presents an interesting look at this little known curiosity of World War II history, and the performances by Rahn and Reyes manage to be very haunting. But, fair warning, the road to heaven is a little bumpy. Seat belts recommended.

For tickets and showtimes, consult the show’s website at www.waytoheaventheplay.com.

Click for print friendly PDF version of this blog post

The Joke's on You, Too

The question of why we humans lie has certainly been explored by writers, sociologists and child psychologists alike. But like our other inherent inclinations toward morally questionable behavior, the subject continues to baffle—and inspire—us. No Tea Productions’ Liars, a compilation of eight one-act comedies by eight different writers, examines lying through a broad, sometimes fantastical lens: among its more extreme characters are a Red Bull-fueled film agent, a homicidal Santa Claus and a bathroom scale prone to vicious insults. At its most poignant, however, the work discovers irony and humor in everyday scenarios that are likely to ring true and be almost embarrassingly familiar. On several occasions it honestly and effectively nails us, while keeping us in on the joke. Liars starts off with Jeremy Mather’s "Sausage Party," a work that heavily draws on this idea of familiarity and also prevails as one of the collection’s most memorable pieces. Set at a generic house party (think pretzel bags, handles of vodka and Dixie cups), Mather’s work narrates a hilarious collision between Brad (Jesse Bernath), his straight-talking girlfriend Cassie (Sabrina Farhi), and Brad’s sloppy, relentlessly embarrassing friend Isaac (Mather himself). As we watch these characters casually double-cross each other to fulfill temporary urges and save face, we are likely to recognize our own tendencies to cop out with a white lie. Mather’s text is raunchy without delving into gross-out territory, and includes several effectively timed one-liners.

The following two plays, "Weight" by director Lindsey Moore and "LOL" by Caroline O’Hare, rely on setting up comedic scenarios rather than delving into narratives, but still push Liars forward as a cohesive work. Without uttering a single word, Alicia Barnatchez is magnetic as a woman who tries to make peace with her verbally abusive scale in "Weight," and displays similar, vulnerable spunk as a hopeful chat room visitor in "LOL."

Some of the weakest moments in Liars occur after its midpoint. "Peek," a depiction of a nightmarish first date, benefits from a genuinely funny setup and features another committed performance by Jeremy Mather, but suffers from an excessive number of scenes that give the play a dragging feel. Meanwhile, Joe Musso’s "Wisconsin" and Matt Sears’ "Lore" seem out of place in the production. "Wisconsin" is a stand-alone joke with an unremarkable punch line, while "Lore," a dramatic clash between an enraged Santa and a little girl, is too radical a departure from the collection’s more relatable moments.

Liars picks up at the end, however, with "Evacuation Plan," a clever and heartfelt work penned by No Tea's artistic director Jeff Sproul. Starring Sproul as a guy who unsuccessfully attempts to conceal his odd habits from a new girlfriend, the work contrasts elements of surprising sweetness with an ironic undertone: as some characters discover safety in honesty, others continue to initiate romantic relationships under a false façade.

Transitions from one play to the next are smooth, and good use is made of the small stage at Under St. Marks. The cast of actors, many of whom have appeared in previous No Tea Productions, have thrown themselves into their roles so wholeheartedly that even the image of chairs doubling as urinals doesn’t distract us from their strangely familiar world. Even as we laugh, many of us are likely to shake our heads in uneasy recognition.

Click for print friendly PDF version of this blog post

Best Friends…Forever?

Teen roles are among the most challenging to portray. Their problems often look trivial to adult audiences, while their contemporaries feel as though their lives are depicted in too facile a manner (it must be particularly hard to for a teenager to identify with a character being portrayed by a performer whose age is actually a decade or so older). Fear not, though. Director Geordie Broadwater and his Babel Theatre Project company have mounted in Christmas Is Miles Away a production that mines the landscape of teen confusion and disaffection at the Connelly Theatre. This is due in large part to Chloe Moss’ perceptive script.

Moss, a Susan Smith Blackburn Prize recipient this year, has an acute understanding of young emotions, those that are deeply felt but whose expression is difficult, and occasionally discouraged by others. In the course of eleven scenes spanning two years, structured in a deliberately meandering style, Moss charts the lives of three semi-bright young things.

Christie (Alex Fast) and Luke (Roger Lirtsman) are two sixteen-year-olds coming of age in Manchester, England, in the winter of 1989. The two are best friends, or, at least, a teenage version of such. As they talk of girls, travel, and other topics just within their purview, their conversations are riddled with the subtle power plays typical of ones looking to undercut the other in the areas in which they are most insecure.

Over time, life happens. Christie’s father passes away, and he begins to date Julie (Emily Landham), while Luke joins the army. Moss’s scenes, usually separated by several months apiece, develop each character’s gradual estrangement from one another, and their feeble attempts to remain connected despite their changing interests and experiences. As Christie pursues his more artistic impulses, Luke enlists in the first Gulf War.

The role of the war, and how it changes Luke, is the one area that I think Moss could have expanded further. Where the playwright does excel beyond many others, however, is her ability to make the disconnect between these mentalities palpable through her use of pauses, silences, clipped dialogue, and things left unsaid but understood; I was reminded of the profundity of Ernest Hemingway’s The End of Something.

The three actors are a major gift to Christmas, locating that precise point in which teenagers can be completely wrapped up in their lives and still emerge as sympathetic. Fast has a bit more material to work with on the page; Moss provides a roadmap of awkwardness and fear for Christie, which Fast navigates perfectly. Lirtsman is required to be a bit more resourceful, using more actorly tools to show Luke’s hidden pockets of worry and volatility to shine through. Lirtsman thrives with such a challenge, however, giving a performance that is as physically specific as it is emotionally colored.

Landham fits into the play nicely, showing how Julie, as a woman, can simultaneously be worth both more currency and less to two male friends at the same time. In Christmas, Moss looks at the different forms of behavior that occur between men still maturing when alone with each other, when alone with women, and when in mixed company, and her insight into such intimacy is incalculable. It is Landham’s role to show the toll these changes in behavior can have on a relationship, and, she, too, delivers a performance of stunning dedication.

Perhaps one of the more remarkable traits of Christmas is that despite the deceptively complicated subject matter and layered performances, this show is actually quite easy to sit through, thanks to Broadwater’s fluid pacing. No scene goes on for too long nor gives any audience member a chance for distraction. Daniel Zimmerman’s scenic design changes and Dan Scully’s lighting cues go a long way to moving the show along in such a seamless manner.

One thing is for sure: in a play about the fragility of friendship, it is important to keep the right people by your side. I hope that the Babel Theatre Project and Moss stick together to come up with more works to match this success.

Click for print friendly PDF version of this blog post

In the Closet, Hanging Together

That “temperamental” was a euphemism for “homosexual” in the early 1950s is just one of the tidbits audiences may discover in Jon Marans’s impressive dramatic reconstruction of the history of the Mattachine Society, its founders, and the claustrophobic lives of gay men in the 1950s. Although the Stonewall riots in June 1969 are considered the birth of the modern gay-rights movement, The Temperamentals establishes that decades earlier there were ideas in the air that have become common currency in discussing gay rights. “We are not broken heterosexuals,” says protagonist Harry Hay, a former B-movie actor, Communist, and married temperamental. “We are an oppressed minority.”

Starting in 1950, the play follows Harry (Thomas Jay Ryan) and his boyfriend, a young Austrian immigrant named Rudi Gernreich (Michael Urie, employing a subtle Teutonic accent). Gernreich will go on to become a major fashion designer, renowned for introducing the string bikini in the 1960s. (Theatergoers may recall that Marans’ celebrated 1996 play, Old Wicked Songs, took place in Vienna; the Austrian connection here is more tangential, however.)

Although The Temperamentals takes the Hay-Gernreich affair as a starting point, it broadens through flashbacks to encompass the founding of the Mattachine Society and the stories of its principals. They include Bob Hull (Matthew Schneck), a gregarious playboy in the gay world, and his mousy ex-boyfriend but devoted friend, Chuck Rowland (Tom Beckett). Also crucial is carnival roustabout Dale Jennings (Sam Breslin Wright), whose open challenge of a public-restroom arrest becomes a landmark case, although his acquittal via hung jury is ignored by the mainstream press. In the characters’ whispers, glances, furtive touching, and oblique comments, Marans summons up a world of oppressive fear and shame. Daniel Kluger’s discordant sound design conveys the unsettled nerves that these men must have experienced as they gingerly sought out like-minded companions.

Most of the actors double as other characters—even Urie, who’s best known as the flamboyant Marc St. James on Ugly Betty, gets to play a thuggish restaurant employee, with aplomb, to point up that California laws of the era specifically forbade service to homosexuals. And the superb Beckett is periodically a natty, epicene Vincente Minnelli, who is approached to join the Society. It’s thought that, because Minnelli is married to Judy Garland and therefore must be heterosexual, he will be able to draw the sympathies of straight people to their cause.

Jonathan Silverstein’s bare-bones production in a small, black-box theater features folding chairs that, upended, double as terrain. The simplicity of the design (by Clint Ramos, who also supplied the beautifully tailored men’s suits) allows one to focus on the actors and the information—and there’s a lot of it. Swift cross-cutting helps convey mountains of facts quickly; however, at times they become overwhelming. A powerful scene in a diner segues quickly through a discussion of an “underground railroad” and then hurtles into a scene that, with its religious language, sounds like a church meeting, but turns out to be a Mattachine gathering. At such moments one is apt to feel bewildered.

Apart from the breakneck flow of information, occasionally Marans’ writing has the ring of contrivance from hindsight: Harry tells Rudi, “Someday the Temperamentals will not only be making the quotes, but be in them…. I guarantee it will happen.” And it’s unfortunate that Ryan’s blunt, macho Harry and Urie's Rudi don’t have much chemistry together. (That may be because the politics takes over.) Still, in an era when openly gay people are fighting for the right to marry, this time-travel back to the nuclear winter of the closet is absorbing, despite its bumps.

Marans writes crisp dialogue and has a nice sense of irony as well. Even as Bob resents the oppression of gays, he announces: “Some things are better kept separate. Like bourbon and barbiturates. Communism and Christianity. Negroes and whites.” It’s a sentiment that now seems as alien as the notion that gay men should find solace in marrying women, or that equal rights should depend on the will of the majority and not on the words of the Founding Fathers.

Click for print friendly PDF version of this blog post

The Opposites of Sex

Uncertainty reigns in Jonathan Marc Sherman’s strangely unsatisfying 1993 play about college students confronting the gray-shaded real world from their ivory towers. Their initiation is the case of a favorite professor who is accused of sexual harassment. Could it be that the popular Whitey McCoy (Jonathan Hogan) forced troubled student Jack Kahn (Michael Carbonaro) into sexual acts, as Jack has accused him? Or is McCoy telling the truth when he says that a very drunk, sexually conflicted Jack came to his quarters late one night and made a pass at him that Whitey rebuffed? Then, says Whitey, Jack asked to stay the night and was gone in the morning. As in Akira Kurosawa’s film Rashomon, differing versions of the event are shown, and both look plausible.

Sherman’s title refers to the Greek school of philosophy in which one views both sides of a debate in order to become more persuasive and win one’s opponent to one’s side. The scandal of Jack and Whitey is only a prelude to a second act in which the focus turns to Whitey’s staunchest defender, caught in a similar situation. Though the nuance is interesting, the interweaving of the two stories doesn’t really work.

The manipulative, womanizing Xavier Reynolds (Charlie Hewson), nicknamed Ex, grapples not only with raging testosterone but also with confusion about sexual behavior. Ex, dumped by his girlfriend Robin (Natalie Knepp) for cheating, puts the moves on Robin’s friend Debbie (Mahira Kakkar), who confessed a fantasy to him: that she be taken sexually against her will—by him. But as soon as Ex starts to paw her, she resists him, and he stops. In the opinion of Ex’s bandmate Willy, though, she had issued Ex an invitation. Which of the men is right? Would Ex have been accused of rape? Or would he have been a victim of mixed signals?

For Debbie, there’s no uncertainty about what took place. Nor, indeed, for Robin. When Ex begs Robin to marry him, following the incident with Debbie, he claims that only after Debbie’s rejection did he realize his need and love for Robin. (It’s a tribute to Hewson and director James Warwick that this change of heart plays so persuasively.)

“You make these meaningless little distinctions in life,” Ex tells the skeptical Robin, suggesting he’s missed the point. In a comedy of errors, when Ex discovers another chum (Ian Alda, in a sad and funny turn as a dating loser) in Robin’s bed, he too jumps to a wrong conclusion. Ironically, it’s the ever-high Willy who recognizes the pervading uncertainty of such cases as he plays devil’s advocate to Ex’s fervent support of Whitey: “But the problem of the thing is, like, nobody fucking knows,” he says.

The play serves as a fine showcase for young actors, and they inhabit the characters convincingly on Charles Corcoran’s simple but detailed set of two dorm rooms. Hewson is a narcissistic, exuberantly randy Ex, and Maximillian Osinski is often hilarious as the drug-fueled Willy, who may be gay. Knepp is a level-headed Robin, but the role is a bit contrived. Because Robin is editor of the school paper, she probes the issue of Whitey’s dismissal and serves as a connecting thread for Whitey’s dilemma and the students’ grappling with it.

Since the second half feels somewhat detached from the first, even Robin’s climactic valedictory speech, a rumination about the university’s court settlement with Whitey, doesn’t successfully pull the whole together.

“This doesn’t feel like a fight, or a debate—not really,” she says, lamenting the black-and-white idealism she’s been taught (and suggesting that the students are a long way from grasping the complexity of life). “This feels like compromise. This feels … very hollow.” It’s a shame that a play that has so many interesting aspects doesn’t register more strongly in the whole.

Click for print friendly PDF version of this blog post

War Will Always Be With Us

“War is our imprint, war is our mark… war is absolutely what we do,” states Uncle Pinkie in Finding the Rooster, the new production at the 13th Street Repertory Company written and directed by Terence Patrick Hughes. The play focuses on a family at war – both through its complex involvement with the military and international armed conflicts, and because of the family’s internal struggles. A married couple, Richard and Evelyn Fine, are in the throes of a bitter divorce when Richard makes the choice to have their misbehaving son, Oscar, “dismantled” into many small pieces and then reassembled once he has arrived at military school. The Fines have already lost one son in military conflict, and Pinkie, Oscar’s uncle on his mother’s side, was named a war hero for his experiences in the D-Day landing at Normandy. What Pinkie did was “find the rooster;" he won a medal for the way in which he would enter small villages and kill the local rooster, the town’s alarm clock, allowing the soldiers time to occupy the town before the citizens awoke. In addition, Richard’s family, whose nouveau riche status is noted, has made its wealth through the production of weaponry; they have become rich off of war.

All of this amounts to a very complicated story. It is often hard to tie all of the loose threads of the story together in order to create a cohesive whole. The play is clearly in the same vein as such dramatic classics as Arthur Miller’s All My Sons and George Bernard Shaw’s Major Barbara, but does not add anything new to the conversation about the conflict that can arise from family money being procured off of war, particularly a war to which the family has sacrificed a family member’s life. The world of the play is aware of the dense literary world in which it exists; the characters, particularly Pinkie, are preoccupied with the great authors and classic works of literature, they quote constantly from famous writing, and the play’s second act is entirely set within a library.

In this second act, which is more directly centered around Oscar and Pinkie than was the first act (the first act is much more driven by the divorce plot-line and the actual dismantling of Oscar), the play hits on its most compelling theme, the point that makes it unique from many other plays about the effects of war on families. Because Pinkie has such a close relationship with literature – he tells exciting tales of times spent with the greatest authors of the twentieth century – and because Pinkie has made such an impression on Oscar through these stories, the second act highlights the strange relationship between great literary art and war. Many of the authors mentioned or cited had themselves lived through important military conflicts, even having directly participated in some cases. Pinkie himself is a veteran of war and a storyteller.

It is clear that the fantastical tales that Pinkie tells of his great adventures with these literary giants have allowed him to escape the reality of his life, and perhaps to suppress or erase what he experienced during wartime. The play sets out an interesting comparison between war as a cause of experiences, and literature as a potential effect of such experiences. It almost seems as if literature can act as a protection or as an antidote to conflict. In a particularly telling moment, bookcases are used to hold back a slew of divorce lawyers who are attempting to break-in to the library. The particular shelves used are chosen for their “weight.”

Hughes’s play also raises interesting questions about identity for each of the characters; they grapple with who they are and how this persona can be defined. Is identity defined through one’s clothes (Oscar is preoccupied with wearing his late brother’s military attire, for example), through the stories one relates of one’s own life (in the case of Pinkie), through one’s financial status (the difference between Evelyn’s old and Richard’s new wealth), or through the opinions of others? However, these compelling questions are sometimes hard to keep track of during the play because there are so many things going on simultaneously. In addition, much action is kept off-stage, because each act is grounded in a sole location. Because so much is told and not shown, it is hard to recall exactly what has happened and what it means to and for each of the characters. It is very much a text-driven play, and there is a lot of information of which to keep track.

So much of the action is driven by dialogue, and perhaps because of this, there are many good one-liners throughout the play. In particular, Stoker, who comes in to dismantle Oscar, is given a great deal of very humorous quips. In his portrayal of Stoker, Reggie Oldham delivers these jokes with punch and verve. Kevin Hauver portrays Pinkie in such a manner as to encapsulate beautifully the thin line between reality and fiction when one tells of one’s own life. His speeches are poignantly written and very well-performed. The rest of the actors – Jonathan Harper Schlieman, Kathryn Neville Browne, and Dave Benger – try their hardest to keep the energy high no matter which of the issues raised by the play is at stake. If the text were slightly less at war with itself over which is the main theme and directed more precisely at one issue, then perhaps the play would be able to have a clearer effect on its viewer.

Click for print friendly PDF version of this blog post

Dance of Death

There’s a lot to admire in the dazzling Gin & ‘It’, now playing at P.S. 122 in the East Village. Created and directed by Reid Farrington, a former video designer for The Wooster Group, this multimedia production shares a similar aesthetic with that boundary-pushing ensemble, melding film installation and live performance in spectacular fashion. Farrington’s The Passion of Joan of Arc from 2008 (also at P.S. 122) was his directorial debut. Gin & ‘It’ reaches further than that visually stunning solo performance of Carl Theodor Dryer’s 1928 silent film masterpiece with four live performers onstage recreating Alfred Hitchcock’s Rope. The actors from the master of suspense’s 1948 thriller starring Jimmy Stewart and Farley Granger have been digitally isolated and projected on to moveable screens that a quartet of Grips shuttle around the set while simultaneously enacting the film’s main actions in a striking celluloid/human hybrid.

Most of Rope, a retelling of the infamous and true Nathan Leopold and Richard Loeb story of two gay, Nietzschean “supermen” who kill a friend for the thrill of it, remains intact for much of Gin & ‘It’. A few reels of the film are intentionally left out towards the end, but the narrative does not suffer for that omission.

Rope was called a “stunt” by Hitchcock, who was attempting to portray the one-act, one-set drama as having been shot in one continuous take. Gin & ‘It’, likewise, tries to recreate the complexity of the technical demands of such a shoot. Farrington’s intricate choreography of the action is awesome to behold, especially when the Grips act out moments of the film with the help of simple props such as cigarette lighters or hats, with the faces or various body parts of the film’s actors displayed on the moveable screens.

Having rewatched Rope before attending the show, I was able to concentrate on the ballet-like rhythms of the hard-working Grips, who hit their cues with precision, except for a probable newcomer (played by Christopher Loar) who kept missing his marks and was reproached with barks of “It’s gotta be perfect!” by head Grip Karl Allen. This obsession with perfection parallels the killers’ own desire for supremacy.

Additional layers added on to the recreation of this filmic “perfect crime” become the most fascinating aspects of the production. The flirtation between and subtle sexuality of the cast members mimics the unspoken gay relationship of the movie’s killers, Brandon and Phillip. (“It” being, after all, the term coined by Hitchcock and screenwriter Arthur Laurents for homosexuality to evade the censors.) And when Chris, the not-so-perfect Grip, is bound, gagged, and hung from his feet in the middle of the stage, the violence is an obvious correlation to the strangulation of the “inferior” classmate of the Leopold and Loeb stand-ins that gives the film its title.

Although I found the production a bit too esoteric for the average theatergoer, I was fascinated by the blurring of filmmaking and theatermaking techniques on display. Is the show simply a visual diary of the attempt to recreate Hitchcock’s film onstage? Or is it an insider’s view of what it takes to create a precisely-orchestrated multimedia production, including the training (and hazing) of cast members and technicians?

A familiarity with both the original source material and perhaps even the behind-the-scenes workings of movies or theater (or both) might be helpful in appreciating the complexity of the goings-on onstage. But the interweaving of film, theater, and technique in Gin & ‘It’ remains an inventive and fastidious tour de force that stands as a fitting homage to Hitchcock himself and the spirit of artistic creation as well.

Click for print friendly PDF version of this blog post

Gender Benders

Downtown queer theater doesn’t come more “out there” than Cracked Ice, a mélange of drag, music, circus acts, monologues, and campy costumes that plays as a kind of vaudeville fever dream about the current financial crisis and Bernard Madoff. Directed by Circus Amok founder Jennifer Miller, the show features contributions from Kenny Mellman, one half of the Kiki & Herb show; Deb Margolin, a veteran of Split Britches; and the Wau Wau Sisters. Be warned: The humor in the show is an acquired taste. This is the sort of thing you’ll like if you like this sort of thing. The level of comedy can be discerned from the punned names of the two main characters, the Liberty sisters: Statua Liberty (Miller) and Sybil Liberty (Carlton Cyrus Ward). The central conceit is that Sybil, without the knowledge of Statua, has invested the sisters’ money in a Ponzi scheme run by Madoff and, of course, lost it all. Miller and Ward play their characters as if they were Laverne and Shirley on speed, and Miller has directed others to the same level of hysteria, notably Salley May as a roller skater named Flo.

Even if the dialogue isn’t Noel Coward, it would help to understand the alternately rushed and swallowed lines from several of the cast. Even the Liberty sisters’ jokes, credited to Jay Leno, often fizzle because of a lack of comic timing or audibility. Rae C. Wright (who resembles Simone de Beauvoir) has the advantage of more measured speech in less frantic roles, as she cross-dresses as a plumber, who morphs into a woman named Bernadette, who is actually Bernard Madoff in disguise. I think. The rest of the drag in the show is in the English style. That means that there’s no attempt to disguise the facial or chest hair on the men (and Miller, who has a full beard and chest hair, doesn’t disguise hers).

Costumers Jonathan Berger and Charlotte Lily Gaspard have gone all-out on headdresses, spangles and boas, and Berger, who also did the sets, cleverly hangs mobiles of diamond shapes, in powder blue and silver spangles, over the audience, a nice visual play on the “ice” of the title.

Periodically, the Wau Wau sisters (Tanya Gagne and Adrienne Truscott) appear behind a two-dimensional bathtub with (painted cardboard) plants growing in it, and clopping on in Lederhosen and wooden shoes. (It’s a toss-up if they’re Swiss or Dutch.) They are the sons of Bernadette, apparently, who is Bernard Madoff in disguise.

Jokes are thrown out willy-nilly, as when the plumber enters and asks, “Anybody need their pipes cleaned?” And sometimes there are delightful turns of phrase: "I just tell the truth in a completely false way," says Bernadette/Bernie.

But the Keystone Kops–style slapstick grows tiresome; it’s not hilarious just to show up and throw things around. Interspersed with these antics are dances and songs, with music and lyrics by Mellman (Herb of Kiki & Herb). The songs provide amiable interludes, but it’s the physical aspects of the show that succeed best. They include the dexterous Miller and Ward juggling Indian clubs, courtesy of their experience with Circus Amok, and one of the Wau Wau Sisters singing a brief, 60-second song as the other holds a handstand for the full minute.

Melman at the piano also provides unobtrusive underscoring to much of the action as well, although Novice Theory, one of the various rotating guest artists who appear in the show, did a smashing accordion piece on the night I attended—one that he wrote.

Most impressive is the choreography by Faye Driscoll, one of whose pieces excels in silence. Driscoll’s dances are demanding and executed with vigor and synchronization by the cast. Unlike the rest of the show, they seem to have been rehearsed sufficiently. Certainly, when one of the funniest moments is the accidental loss of two wigs, and Miller herself looks unsure which wig to retrieve for her character because they are nearly identical, it’s a good guess that some aspects of the show haven’t been polished quite enough.

Click for print friendly PDF version of this blog post